4.3 Article

Family practice with fathers, social care, and capabilities

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12528

关键词

family intervention; fatherhood; fathers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this article is to provide a novel theoretical perspective on family practitioners' engagement with fathers by utilizing theories of social care and capabilities. The research on low engagement of fathers in family and child-related social interventions has evolved along three main axes: fathers' perspectives, workers' perceptions, and effectiveness of father-oriented programs. The existing research is criticized for the lack of a unifying theoretical framework and insufficient attention to relationality and agency issues. The application of theories of care and the capabilities approach raises new questions and directions for further studies on father engagement, particularly in the areas of power dynamics within families and welfare systems, and the influence of agency.
The aim of this article is to offer a novel theoretical perspective on family practitioners' engagement with fathers, through the lens of theories of social care and capabilities. The paper shows how research on low engagement of fathers in family- and child-related social interventions has advanced along three main axes: (a) giving voice to fathers, (b) analyzing workers' perceptions, and (c) what works analysis of father-oriented programs. I point to several problems in existing research: the absence of a unifying theoretical framework and the lack of sufficient attention to issues of relationality and agency. Theories of care and the capabilities approach are offered as a framework. Applying these theoretical frameworks to existing research on father engagement raises new questions and directions for further studies, mainly in two directions: first, relationality and the configurations of relations and power within families and within welfare systems, and second, the effect of agency on father engagement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据