3.8 Article

The use of botulinum toxin for grinding in patients with Rett syndrome-Case report

期刊

SPECIAL CARE IN DENTISTRY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/scd.12918

关键词

botulinum toxin; case report; methyl-CpG-binding protein; Rett syndrome; surface electromyography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article focuses on the case of an 8-year-old child with RTT and the use of botulinum toxin-based treatment for teeth grinding. The study utilizes surface electromyography to monitor the effects of the treatment, and results show a significant reduction in grinding frequency and tension of the affected muscles. The article emphasizes the need for further research on a larger sample to establish the efficacy of botulinum toxin therapy for patients with RTT.
AimsRett syndrome (RTT) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by a mutation in the methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene. It is characterized by profound and severe motor disability. Patients with RTT grind their teeth, causing damage to their permanent teeth. This article aims to describe the case of an 8-year-old child with RTT and the methods of botulinum toxin-based treatment for teeth grinding. Methods and ResultsSurface electromyography (sEMG) was used to monitor the effects of treatment. The masseter and temporal muscles, responsible for the elevation of the mandible, were injected with botulinum toxin. The results of the sEMG examination performed 1 week, 1 month and 4 months after toxin administration were compared to the sEMG conducted before treatment. The research demonstrates a significant reduction in both grinding frequency and tension of the masseter and temporal muscles. ConclusionPossible adverse effects after chronic use of botulinum toxin were discussed. The article also emphasizes the need for masticatory muscle rehabilitation during botulinum toxin therapy. However, it is necessary to repeat this procedure on a larger group of children with RTT to establish our efforts' efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据