4.0 Article

Validation of dysphagia perception to predict the risk for dysphagia in non-institutionalized older adults

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 358-363

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.07.014

关键词

Aged; Deglutition disorders; Deglutition; Elderly nutrition; Validation study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the validity of self-perceived dysphagia in community-dwelling older adults. The results showed that the risk of dysphagia according to the Eating Assessment Tool was 12.9% and the self-perception of dysphagia was 8.8%. Due to the low sensitivity and positive predictive value, caution should be exercised in using a single question to analyze self-perceived dysphagia.
Background and aims: Dysphagia is a swallowing disorder that affects mainly the older adults and can compromise quality of life, and increase the risk for malnutrition and aspiration. Early diagnosis is, therefore, essential to prevent adversities. We aimed to evaluate the validity of self-perceived dysphagia in community-dwelling older adults (60 years or older) from Pelotas, Brazil, participants in the COMO VAI? study.Methods: The Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) was used as the reference tool to identify the risk for dysphagia and the self-perception of dysphagia was assessed using the following question: Do you have swallowing difficulties? (Yes/No). The parameters of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were described with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and according to independent variables (sex, age, economic level, and education).Results: The prevalence of dysphagia risk according to EAT-10 and self-perception was 12.9% (95% CI 10.2 -16.1) and 8.8% (95% CI 6.6-11.6), respectively. Sensitivity was 34.8% (95% CI 23.5-47.6) and the highest values were observed in women and the older individuals (80 years or older). Specificity was 95.1% (95% CI 92.6-96.9). PPV was 51.1% (95% CI 35.8-66.3), NPV 90.8% (95% CI 87.8-93.2) and accuracy 87.3%.Conclusions: Considering the low sensitivity and PPV, the self-perception of dysphagia analyzed with a single question should be used with caution, as an individual at risk for dysphagia may not realize their condition.& COPY; 2023 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据