Stakeholder theory: Exploring systems-theoretic and process-philosophic connections

Modern stakeholder theory is premised on the 'integration thesis', according to which business and ethics constitute an inseparable unity. For many management scholars, this thesis raised the difficult question of how far business can pursue ethical goals without losing its functional autonomy. We address this question by interpreting the integration thesis as the Luhmannian 'unity of difference' of business and ethics. This interpretation allows business and ethics to remain conceptually distinct, yet takes their very distinction to constitute a logical and dialectical unity as envisioned by the integration thesis. To justify this interpretation, we draw on the Luhmannian systems theory which accentuates the precariousness of the environment faced by business corporations, and on process philosophy which underscores the unique human capacity to navigate this precariousness by following social norms of ethical behaviour. We argue that a key prerequisite of successful stakeholder management is the activation of this human capacity.

Automated summary

Modern stakeholder theory is based on the 'integration thesis', which argues that business and ethics are inseparable. Scholars have questioned how far business can pursue ethical goals without compromising its autonomy. This study interprets the integration thesis as the Luhmannian 'unity of difference' and argues that successful stakeholder management requires activating the human capacity to navigate the uncertainties of the business environment by following ethical norms, drawing on Luhmannian systems theory and process philosophy.