4.2 Article

Have Teens' Cohabitation, Marriage, and Childbearing Goals Changed Since the Great Recession?

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11113-023-09833-8

关键词

Teen expectations; Cohabitation; Marriage; Childbearing; Family formation; Attitudes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expectations and intentions of teenagers regarding family behaviors have not significantly weakened in the years after the Great Recession. The majority of teenagers still expect to marry and intend to have children, with a growth in expectations for cohabitation. Gender differences in cohabitation expectations persist, but differences in fertility intentions and marital intentions have disappeared.
The uneven recovery of the post-Great Recession years has been accompanied by changing family behaviors throughout the U.S. For teens, whose family building years are largely still to come, these broader shifts may have influenced their expectations of cohabitation, marriage, or childbearing in the future. Further, given variation in gender socialization, teen girls and boys may think differently about their future family behaviors. In this project, we analyzed cohabitation, marriage, and childbearing expectations and intentions among teens ages 15-19 by gender using National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) data, representing the years 2012-2018. Since the Great Recession, the vast majority of teens continued to expect to marry and intend to have children, with less certainty but growth nonetheless in cohabitation expectations. By 2018, gender differentials in cohabitation expectations persisted, gender differences in fertility intentions disappeared, and there were no gender differences in marital intentions. In general, we found little evidence of a weakening of teens' expectations and intentions to engage in family formation behaviors in the years since the Great Recession, though it remains to be seen whether teens will actually cohabit, marry, or have children as they move through the life course.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据