4.5 Article

Innovation in stable competitive tendering regimes: An insoluble knot?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101332

关键词

Innovation; Competitive tendering; Public transport; Institutional logics; Contract design; Sweden; Bus market; Stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transportation sector is rapidly developing, driven by innovation and technological changes initiated by various market actors. However, public transport operations are constrained by extensive procurement processes and a mature market where a few large companies compete. In Europe, there is tension between innovative development and regulatory practices shaping procurement processes. This study examines the opportunities for innovation in procurement processes based on experiences from tendering bus transport in Sweden's largest cities.
The transport sector is currently undergoing rapid development, which is to a large extent driven by innovation and technological changes initiated by various market actors. At the same time, public transport operations are largely framed by extensive procurement processes and a mature market where a few large companies compete for market share. In Europe, there is tension between rapid innovative development in the sector, on one hand, and stability given by regulation practices shaping procurement processes, on the other. This paper presents results from a study in which opportunities for innovation in procurement processes were examined. The findings are based on public transport authorities' and transport companies' experiences from tendering bus transport in the three largest cities in Sweden. By using a theoretical perspective of innovation and institutional logics, the paper explains the restrictive role innovation has in procurement processes and discusses the conflicting views transport authorities and transport companies put forward. The paper is of general value since it raises questions related to the complexity of existing tendering regimes and the possibilities of facilitating innovation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据