4.7 Article

Nuclear energy consumption, energy access and energy poverty: Policy implications for the COP27 and environmental sustainability

期刊

TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102385

关键词

Nuclear energy; Energy access; Energy poverty; Sustainable development goals; Environmental quality ' COP27

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the increasing demand for energy resources and environmental challenges, policymakers have shifted their focus to nuclear energy as a solution to energy and environmental issues. This study investigates the role of nuclear energy consumption and provides new evidence to support the significance of energy and environmental policies. The research utilizes methodological and topical contributions, thematic analysis, co-citation analysis, and country-collaboration analysis.
The ever-increasing energy resource demand and subsequent environmental challenges mean that policymakers have shifted their focus to nuclear energy to address energy and environmental issues due to its unlimited potential. The current study investigates the role of nuclear energy consumption to unveil contextual information and report novel evidence concerning the significance of energy and environmental policies. This research is a novel attempt to outline methodological and topical contributions, thematic analysis, co-citation analysis, and country-collaboration analysis. As energy and environmental solutions have been prioritized within sustainable development goals, our research approach would allow policymakers and researchers to understand the extent to which nuclear energy can provide solutions towards environmental sustainability and identify research limitations to overcome by future studies. Moreover, our extensive analysis allows us to argue that nuclear energy impacts energy demand and is the most critical factor in fulfilling environmental commitments under regional and international environmental agreements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据