The politics of the city: Critical theory of technology and urban design(s)

This article aims at approaching urban design from a philosophical point of view, specifically through Andrew Feenberg's critical theory of technology. It attempts to present the politics of urban design, rejecting an urban -technological determinism that refers to a specific technical environment as the only one possible. If technology is an open process with social implications and consequences, the same holds for urban technologies and designs. This approach argues that contemporary cities are formed within a specific socio-technical context which is seemingly the most functional for the current social, political and economic world, but since environmental and urban crises rise, there seems to be a need for rethinking over the form of current cities. Thus, this article at-tempts to offer a theoretical contribution to the debate over alternative urban designs through Andrew Feen-berg's insights. Drawing upon some of his most crucial notions, like the technical code, the interpretative flexibility and the operational autonomy and presenting their role in a philosophy of the city, I attempt to highlight that current urban forms could be replaced by other functional alternatives. The choice over one or another urban design is political hence the need for the relation between the philosophy of the city and technical politics.

Automated summary

This article explores urban design from a philosophical perspective using Andrew Feenberg's critical theory of technology. It challenges the idea that urban design is determined solely by technological factors and argues for the consideration of social implications. The article suggests that as environmental and urban crises escalate, it is necessary to rethink the current forms of cities and consider alternative designs. It proposes Andrew Feenberg's insights as a theoretical contribution to this debate.