Everyday Discrimination Scale: Dimensionality in a Portuguese community sample and specific versions for sexual and gender minority

Perceived everyday discrimination is a transversal phenomenon with a negative impact on people's health. This study aimed to explore the factor structure and psychometric properties of three versions of the Everyday Discrimination Scale, with three different samples: the European Portuguese validation (EDS-PT, considering any reason for discrimination), using a sample of adults from the community (N = 610), a specific version for sexual minority (EDS-SM), with a sample of sexual minority individuals (N = 352), and a specific version for gender minority (EDS-GM), in a sample of gender minority individuals (N = 108). Factor structure and reliability of the different versions were examined. A second-order two-factor model (Everydaydiscrimination with factor 1 Unfair Treatment and factor 2 Personal Rejection) presented good adjustment and adequate reliability. Furthermore, all versions of EDS revealed weak to moderate correlations with indicators of convergent validity (mental health, satisfaction with life, social safeness, and social support). This study's outcomes provide insights into different types of everyday discrimination and suggest that the EDS-PT, EDS-SM and EDS-GM are valid and reliable measures useful in research and clinical contexts.

Automated summary

This study aimed to explore the factor structure and psychometric properties of three versions of the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS-PT, EDS-SM, and EDS-GM) through validation with different samples. The results revealed a good fit for a second-order two-factor model (Unfair Treatment and Personal Rejection) and adequate reliability. Furthermore, the EDS versions showed weak to moderate correlations with indicators of convergent validity, such as mental health, satisfaction with life, social safeness, and social support. The study highlights the importance of the EDS-PT, EDS-SM, and EDS-GM as valid and reliable measures in research and clinical contexts.