4.3 Article

How Fear of COVID-19 Promotes Posttraumatic Growth During COVID-19 Epidemic: A Moderated Mediation Model

出版社

EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/tra0001603

关键词

college students; posttraumatic growth; fear of COVID-19; positive coping; reflective rumination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the posttraumatic growth (PTG) of Chinese college students in Wuhan during the COVID-19 lockdown. The fear of COVID-19 was found to directly influence PTG and indirectly affect PTG through positive coping. Reflective rumination was found to moderate the association between fear of COVID-19 and positive coping.
Objective: Recent studies have shown that the COVID-19 lockdown contributes to the psychological and physical stress of college students, who are forced to adjust to this tough time. The objective of this study was to explore how positive coping behaviors and fear of COVID-19 predicted posttraumatic growth (PTG) among Chinese college students in Wuhan during the latest lockdown. Method: Chinese college students in Wuhan (N = 982) aged 18-30 were recruited and completed an online survey, which assessed the fear of COVID-19, positive coping, reflective rumination, and PTG. Results: Chinese college students reported high levels of PTG at the total scale (79.4%) and subdomains (83.7%). Fear of COVID-19 can not only directly influence PTG, but can also indirectly affect PTG through the mediating role of positive coping. Additionally, reflective rumination moderates the association between fear of COVID-19 and positive coping, whereby fear of COVID-19 promotes positive coping in college students with a higher level of reflective rumination. Conclusion: PTG in college students is the result of both positive behavior and reflective cognition during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Therefore, in order to promote students' positive psychological changes, students should be encouraged to interpret situations positively and take proactive responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据