4.5 Article

Research Interdisciplinarity and Citation Impact: A Network Analysis of Social Networking Sites Research

期刊

SAGE OPEN
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/21582440231193472

关键词

interdisciplinarity; author co-citation network; citation analysis; social networking sites; scientometrics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the influence of interdisciplinary research on scholars through the author co-citation network approach. It focuses on the field of social networking sites (SNS) research and explores whether interdisciplinary collaboration promotes academic impact. The findings suggest that interdisciplinary collaboration has an impact on the scholarly influence of scholars in the field of SNS research.
The influence of interdisciplinary research has become a trending topic in library and information science. However, research examining the influence of interdisciplinarity on scholars is still limited. This current study examines the interdisciplinarity from the author co-citation network approach. We focus on the field of social networking sites (SNS) research, namely studies about online platforms that people use for networking (e.g., Facebook), and examine whether interdisciplinarity would promote academic impact. About 2,489 articles in the field of SNS published from 2014 to 2016 were retrieved, with 611 first authors cited by those articles identified. The interdisciplinarity of the scholar was assessed in the author co-citation networks using two indexes: betweenness centrality and constraint. We identified four primary disciplines of SNS research in 2014 to 2016. Interdisciplinarity indexes were used to predict the scholarly impact in this field in the next 3-year interval (2017-2019), measured by citation counts. We found that citation number was predicted by betweenness centrality but not by constraint. Theoretical and practical implications of interdisciplinarity in research activities are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据