4.5 Article

The influence of course community and personal community support on learner engagement in online courses

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-023-10189-1

关键词

Learner engagement; Community; Academic community of engagement; Community of inquiry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to understand the impact of course community support and personal community support on learner engagement. Surveying students from a small art and design school who had recently completed an online course, the results showed that variations in learner engagement can be explained by 40% based on course community and personal community support. These findings are significant for course designers, instructors, and university support staff, as they can be used to design online course content and intervention strategies to maximize learner engagement.
Learner engagement in online courses is impacted by a wide variety of factors. The purpose of this study was to understand to what extent course community support and personal community support influence learner engagement. Students who had recently completed an online course in a small art and design school were surveyed on their level of engagement in the course, experience of the course community of inquiry, and their level of personal social support, with 74 students participating. The survey responses were used in a stepwise multiple regression analysis to create a model that explains to what extent course community and personal community explain variations in learner engagement. 74. 40% of variations in learner engagement could be explained on the basis of course community and personal community support. The results are significant in that they help course designers, instructors, and university support staff understand the interaction between course community, personal community, and learner engagement. That understanding could be used to design both online course content and intervention strategies to maximize learner engagement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据