4.2 Article

Participation changed my mindset. Transformative learning about agrobiodiversity in citizen science projects

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2023.2252627

关键词

Agrobiodiversity; citizen science; tactile tool; transformative learning; pro-environmental behaviour

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Learning about natural resources through citizen science projects can promote environmentally friendly behavior. This study explores the learning outcomes of a citizen science project that focused on agrobiodiversity in landscape observatories in Flanders, Belgium. Participants gained practical knowledge and changed their views and actions towards agrobiodiversity, particularly those with less prior knowledge. The tactile tool of the m(2) gardens and frequent communication were considered key learning tools.
Within citizen science projects, learning about natural resources can encourage environmentally friendly behaviour. More empirical understanding is needed on how citizen science projects facilitate learning outcomes to support sustainable resource management, such as agrobiodiversity. Here we present the learning outcomes of a citizen science project where participants interacted with agrobiodiversity in landscape observatories in Flanders (Belgium). The observatories consisted of square-meter (m(2)) gardens planted with vegetable crops. Participants were asked to visit their m2-garden and to perform tasks according to a scientific protocol (e.g. harvesting). Most of the knowledge gained was practical, while some was more in-depth. More than half of the respondents changed their views on agrobiodiversity and about a third changed their actions related to agrobiodiversity. Transformative learning outcomes were more likely when participants reported having less prior knowledge. Participants cited the tactile tool of the m(2) gardens and frequent written and informal communication as key learning tools.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据