4.7 Article

Are female teachers more likely to practice grade inflation? Evidence from China

期刊

CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2023.101987

关键词

Female teachers; Grade inflation; Educational inequality; China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines whether high grades accompanying with the growth of female teachers arise from student improvement or grade inflation. The results show that high grades do not result from student progress but from grade inflation. Female teachers practice grade inflation for different students, and the effect is more pronounced among female students, low-ability students, and students in senior grades. The adoption of high-grades practice by female teachers may be influenced by potential pressures under discrimination and uncertainty rather than for the sake of course or students.
Grade inflation has become a global phenomenon that raises concerns in the academia and the public. This study examines whether high grades accompanying with the growth of female teachers arise from student improvement or grade inflation. We use randomly assigned samples from the China Education Panel Survey and obtain the following results. (1) Students taught by female teachers obtain 1.57 grades point higher compared with those taught by male teachers. High grades do not result from student progress but from grade inflation. (2) Female teachers practice grade inflation for different students, and the effect is more pronounced among female students, low-ability students, and students in senior grades. (3) Female teachers may adopt a high-grades practice due to potential pressures under discrimination and uncertainty rather than for the sake of course or students. (4) Last, high grades brought by female teachers lead to less effort for students in the second year. This paper not only provides data support for understanding the increasing grade inflation, but also offers clear implications for the improvement of evaluation systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据