4.2 Article

Social media use, perceived social support, and well-being: Evidence from two waves of surveys peri- and post-COVID-19 lockdown

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/02654075231188185

关键词

Social media; well-being; perceived social support; perceived online network responsiveness; COVID-19; lockdown

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the relationship between active social media use, perceived social support, and well-being during and after a COVID-19 lockdown. The findings suggest that active social media use is positively associated with perceived online network responsiveness, which predicts increased perceived social support. Ultimately, increased social support is linked to reduced loneliness and increased life satisfaction. These findings highlight the potential of social media to complement offline social interactions and fulfill individuals' social needs effectively.
Numerous studies have suggested that active social media use can promote well-being by enhancing perceived social support. However, the relationship between social media use and perceived social support remains inconsistent across studies. This study explores possible mechanisms underlying the relationship between active social media use, perceived social support, and well-being during and after a COVID-19 lockdown. Using online surveys with Chinese participants during (N = 1,131) and after (N = 407) the lockdown period, our findings support a sequential mediation model. Specifically, active social media use was positively associated with perceived online network responsiveness, which in turn, predicted augmented perceived social support. Ultimately, increased social support was linked to reduced loneliness and increased life satisfaction. These findings were consistent both during and after the lockdown, indicating that social media has the potential to complement offline social interactions and effectively fulfill individuals' social needs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据