4.3 Article

Changing Climate, Changing Food Consumption? Impact of Weather Shocks on Nutrition in Malawi

期刊

JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
卷 59, 期 12, 页码 1827-1848

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2023.2244634

关键词

Food security; food utilisation; nutrition; weather; climate change; Malawi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the impact of changing temperature and rainfall patterns on the consumption of macro- and micronutrients among households in Malawi. The results show that decreases in rainfall and increases in temperature are associated with declining nutrition and exacerbating food insecurity in Malawi.
In this study, we capture the impact of changing temperature and rainfall patterns on the estimated consumption of macro-and micronutrients among households in Malawi. We apply a fixed-effects model to household panel data collected between 2010 and 2017, which contains detailed information on food consumption, combined with rainfall and temperature data over the past 30 years. In turn, we aim to identify the impact of weather shocks on household food and nutrition security. We find decreases in rainfall from the long-term average results in declining daily consumption of macronutrients (carbohydrates, protein, fat), and micronutrients (iron, zinc, vitamin C, and B2). Increases in temperature from the long-term average are associated with reduced daily consumption of carbohydrates, protein, iron, zinc, vitamin A, B2, folate, and B12. These results suggest that reduced rainfall and higher temperatures will exacerbate food insecurity in Malawi. As the effects of climate change are becoming more apparent, enhancing our understanding of the effect of weather shocks on nutrition in developing countries will be vital to aid policymakers to implement targeted interventions to advance food and nutrition security in Sub-Saharan Africa. This will be essential to achieve the sustainable development goal of 'Zero Hunger' by 2030.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据