4.3 Article

The State- and Trait-Level Effects and Candidate Mechanisms of Four Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) Practices: Two Exploratory Studies

期刊

MINDFULNESS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12671-023-02193-6

关键词

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy; MBCT; Mindfulness practice; Mechanisms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The primary aim of this study was to explore the effects and potential mechanisms of four Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) practices at both state and trait levels. One hundred sixty adults were randomly assigned to one of four mindfulness practices and the results showed state-level effects in various mechanisms and outcomes, except for state decentering. However, after controlling for pre-scores and additional covariates, no significant between-group effects were found. Trait-level effects were demonstrated in psychological quality of life and most mechanisms, but no between-group effects were found. Changes in mindfulness, self-compassion, decentering, and interoceptive awareness were associated with improvements in psychological quality of life.
ObjectivesThe primary aim was to explore state- and trait-level effects and candidate mechanisms of four Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) practices.MethodOne hundred sixty adults self-selected from the general population were randomized to one of four mindfulness practices: body scan, mindful movement, breath and body, and befriending. Study 1 explored state-level self-compassion, mindfulness, decentering (mechanisms), and pleasantness of thoughts, emotions, and body sensations at multiple time points using two single mindfulness sessions. Study 2 explored trait-level self-compassion, mindfulness, decentering, interoceptive awareness, attentional control (mechanisms), anxiety, depression, and psychological quality of life pre-post 2 weeks of daily practice.ResultsIn study 1, state-level effects were demonstrated in all candidate mechanisms and outcomes within the whole sample across time points (d = 0.27 to 0.86), except for state decentering. After controlling for pre-scores and additional covariates, no between-group effects were found (p = 0.050 to 0.973). In study 2, trait-level effects were demonstrated in psychological quality of life and most candidate mechanisms within the whole sample (d = 0.26 to 0.64) but no between-group effects were found (p = 0.080 to 0.805). Within the whole sample, after controlling for pre-scores, changes in mindfulness, self-compassion, decentering, and interoceptive awareness (i.e. body listening) were associated with improvements in psychological quality of life (r = 0.23 to 0.40) and self-led mindfulness practice (r = 0.18 to 0.23).ConclusionsFuture research should test the generated hypotheses using well-designed, adequately powered, and theory-driven studies that address universal and specific mechanisms in different populations and contexts.Pre-registrationThis study is not pre-registered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据