4.7 Article

How housing welfare policies impact housing cost burdens: An analysis of housing welfare policy efficacy and household characteristics

期刊

HABITAT INTERNATIONAL
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102923

关键词

Housing welfare policies; Housing allowance; Public housing; Housing cost burden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excessive housing costs cause housing and social problems. To tackle this issue, South Korea has implemented housing welfare policies that focus on both supply and demand. These policies have been proven to effectively reduce housing cost burdens.
Excessive housing costs not only cause housing problems but also various social problems. To remedy the increasing burden of housing costs, South Korea has implemented several housing welfare policies. Previously, housing welfare policies focused on housing supply. More recently, policies have focused more on the expanding housing demand. However, there are insufficient empirical studies that show the effectiveness of demandfocused policies and how they reduce housing cost burdens. This study aims to examine the impact of South Korea's housing welfare policies that focus both on supply and demand on housing cost burdens. To examine the effectiveness of housing welfare policies, data from the Korea Welfare Panel Study were analyzed, and households were examined by income level. Results indicate that both supply-focused and demand-focused housing welfare policies had significant effect on reducing housing cost. The housing allowance policy, a demand-focused policy, showed an effect as time passed and the allowance amount increased for all households and low-income households. Rental deposit loan support significantly increased housing cost burdens for high-income households, which may be attributed to how households upgrade to better housing environments with rental deposit loan support. Based on these findings, this study presents policy implications for housing welfare policies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据