4.5 Article

Sustainable use of giant reed to produce industrialized enzymes

期刊

HELIYON
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18748

关键词

Giant reed; Solid-state fermentation; Sustainable use; Enzymes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The giant reed is a fast-growing plant that has spread worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using giant reed in a solid-state fermentation experiment to produce enzymes. Four fungal species were tested, and A. niger GH1 and PSH strains were found to be the best adapted to the plant material, capable of producing multiple enzymes.
The giant reed (Arundo donax) is a fast-growing plant adapted to different climatic and soil conditions; although its origin is Asian, the species has spread throughout the world. During its development, it consumes three times more water than typical native vegetation and is respon-sible for changing the landscape of riparian areas; the high biomass productivity and the annual harvest period make this crop an alternative to produce and/or extract industrial bioproducts. The main objective of this research was to evaluate the feasibility of using giant reed in a bio-process that produces enzymes by a solid-state fermentation experiment, four fungal species were tested (Aspergillus niger GH1, Aspergillus niger PSH, Trichoderma harzianum, and Rhizopus oryzae); enzyme activities were performed using reported methodologies varying only reaction volumes. The A. niger GH1 and PSH strains were the best adapted to the plant material, A. niger GH1 was capable to produce 4 of the 5 evaluated enzymes (cellulase-endoglucanase (174.39 & PLUSMN; 19.62 U/L), xylanase (1313.31 & PLUSMN; 39.25 U/L), invertase (642.22 & PLUSMN; 23.55 U/L), and polyphenol oxidase (6094.01 & PLUSMN; 306.54) while A. niger PSH was able to produce 3 of the 5 evaluated enzymes (cellulase-endoglucanase (147.09 & PLUSMN; 13.88 U/L), xylanase (1307.76 & PLUSMN; 31.40 U/L), and invertase (603.92 & PLUSMN; 3.14 U/L).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据