Advancing social procurement: an institutional work perspective

PurposeThe adoption of social procurement, the emerging practice of using a firm's spending power to generate social value, requires buying firms to navigate conflicts of institutional logics. Adopting an institutional work perspective, this study aims to investigate how buying firms change their existing procurement institutions to adopt and advance social procurement.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted an in-depth case study of a social procurement initiative in the UK. This case study comprised of 16 buying firms that were actively participating in the social procurement initiative at the time of data collection (2020-2021). The data were largely captured through a set of 41 semi-structured interviews.FindingsFour types of institutional work were observed: reducing institutional conflicts, crossing institutional boundaries, legitimising institutional change and spreading the new institutional logic. These different types of institutional work appeared in a sequential way.Originality/valueThis study contributes to various strands of literature investigating the role of procurement in generating value and benefits within societies, adopting an institutional lens to investigate the buying firms' purposeful actions to change procurement institutions. Secondly, this study complements the existing literature investigating the conflicts of institutional logics by illustrating the ways firms address such institutional conflicts when adopting and advancing social procurement. Finally, this work contributes to the recently emerging research on institutional work that examines the creation and establishment of new institutions by considering the existing procurement institutions in the examination of institutional work.

Automated summary

This study investigates how buying firms change their existing procurement institutions in order to adopt and advance social procurement, contributing to the literature on the role of procurement in generating value and benefits within societies. It also complements existing literature on conflicts of institutional logics by illustrating how firms address such conflicts when adopting and advancing social procurement. Furthermore, this work contributes to the emerging research on institutional work by considering existing procurement institutions in the examination of institutional change.