4.6 Article

Phosphorus metabolism in peritoneal dialysis- and haemodialysis-treated patients

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 31, 期 9, 页码 1508-1514

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfv414

关键词

CKD-MBD; dialysis; FGF-23; mineral metabolism; hyperphosphataemia

资金

  1. Baxter Belgium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphorus control is generally considered to be better in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients as compared with haemodialysis (HD) patients. Predialysis phosphorus concentrations are misleading as a measure of phosphorus exposure in HD, as these neglect significant dialysis-related fluctuations. Parameters of mineral metabolism, including parathyroid hormone (PTH) and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), were determined in 79 HD and 61 PD patients. In PD, phosphorus levels were determined mid-morning. In HD, time-averaged phosphorus concentrations were modelled from measurements before and after the mid-week dialysis session. Weekly renal, dialytic and total phosphorus clearances as well as total mass removal were calculated from urine and dialysate collections. Time-averaged serum phosphorus concentrations in HD (3.5 +/- 1.0 mg/dL) were significantly lower than the mid-morning concentrations in PD (5.0 +/- 1.4 mg/dL, P < 0.0001). In contrast, predialysis phosphorus concentrations (4.6 +/- 1.4 mg/dL) were not different from PD. PTH and FGF-23 levels were significantly higher in PD. Despite higher residual renal function, total phosphorus clearance was significantly lower in PD (P < 0.0001). Total phosphorus mass removal, conversely, was significantly higher in PD (P < 0.05). Our data suggest that the time-averaged phosphorus concentrations in patients treated with PD are higher as compared with patients treated with HD. Despite a better preserved renal function, total phosphorus clearance is lower in patients treated with PD. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings in a population with a different demographic profile and dietary background and to define clinical implications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据