4.6 Review

A review of shark conservation and management legal frameworks in the Philippines

期刊

MARINE POLICY
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105713

关键词

Shark policy; Elasmobranchs; Shark legislation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sharks, dating back over 400 million years, are facing significant population declines due to increased fishing pressure and demand for their products. This paper aims to outline the legal frameworks in the Philippines for shark management and conservation, highlighting the need for comprehensive national legislation and global regulation of shark trade. While a national legal framework alone cannot solve all the issues, it can provide a foundation for conservation, research, governance, and communication initiatives.
Sharks are among the oldest groups of vertebrate animals, dating back to over 400 million years ago. In recent decades, fishing pressure and demand for shark products and derivatives, such as fins, meat, oil, have increased significantly, driving global declines in shark populations. Sharks are a valuable resource in the Philippines and are used for both extractive and non-extractive purposes. The primary objective of this paper is to outline international, national, and local legal frameworks that enable the management and conservation of sharks in the Philippines. This review commences by providing some background regarding the politico-legal context of the Philippines, as well as information related to shark populations, fisheries and research in this country. This paper also aims to make a case that the Philippine government is in a unique position to build on the momentum of past initiatives by passing comprehensive national shark legislation and continuing to support regulation of shark trade globally. While a national legal framework on its own cannot solve all the issues related to shark fisheries and management, it will help create and institutionalize an anchor for existing and future conservation, research, governance, and communication initiatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据