4.5 Article

Tourists' Online Information Search Behavior: Combined User-Generated and Marketer-Generated Content in Restaurant Decision Making

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRAVEL RESEARCH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00472875231195314

关键词

eye tracking; visual attention; MGC; UGC; decision making; tourist restaurant selection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the influence of both user-generated content (UGC) and marketer-generated content (MGC) on tourists' choice of restaurant, using eye-tracking technology to measure customers' visual behavior combined with retrospective think-aloud interviews. It provides insights into the roles of pictorial information, written information, and other factors, while clarifying the role of positive and negative reviews in influencing restaurant selection from international tourists' perspectives.
Tourist information search behavior is one of the most important aspects of risk reduction in the travel decision-making process. Understanding tourists' behavior when searching for online information has been heavily weighted toward user-generated content (UGC), mainly employed deductive research approaches. This study examines the influence of both UGC and marketer-generated content (MGC) on tourists' choice of restaurant, using eye-tracking technology to measure customers' visual behavior combined with retrospective think-aloud interviews. Data was collected from 28 participants in a laboratory-based study. Video recordings of participants' eye movements during the task aided participant recall in follow-up interviews. This study offers insights into the integrated investigation of the influence of UGC and MGC on tourists' information search behavior. It validates and extends understanding of the roles of pictorial information, written information, and other factors, and newly clarifies the role of both positive and negative reviews in influencing restaurant selection from international tourists' perspectives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据