4.4 Article

Episodic Memory and Sleep Are Involved in the Maintenance of Context-Specific Lexical Information

期刊

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/xge0001435

关键词

episodic memory; sleep; language comprehension; nonhomonym; word class

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Familiar words come with a wealth of associated knowledge, but updating this knowledge when encountering new instances of a word is a challenge. A recent study found that sleep facilitates the updating of meaning dominance for homonyms. This study tested the generality of this finding by examining nonhomonyms and word-class ambiguous words, and found that sentential experience had a greater influence on interpretation and usage of words after a night's sleep.
Familiar words come with a wealth of associated knowledge about their variety of usage, accumulated over a lifetime. How do we track and adjust this knowledge as new instances of a word are encountered? A recent study (Cognition) found that, for homonyms (e.g., bank), sleep-associated consolidation facilitates the updating of meaning dominance. Here, we tested the generality of this finding by exposing participants to (Experiment 1; N = 125) nonhomonyms (e.g., bathtub) in sentences that biased their meanings toward a specific interpretation (e.g., bathtub-slip vs. bathtub-relax), and (Experiment 2; N = 128) word-class ambiguous words (e.g., loan) in sentences where the words were used in their dispreferred word class (e.g., He will loan me money). Both experiments showed that such sentential experience influenced later interpretation and usage of the words more after a night's sleep than a day awake. We interpret these results as evidence for a general role of episodic memory in language comprehension such that new episodic memories are formed every time a sentence is comprehended, and these memories contribute to lexical processing next time the word is encountered, as well as potentially to the fine-tuning of long-term lexical knowledge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据