4.6 Article

Theorising the causal impacts of social frontiers: The social and psychological implications of discontinuities in the geography of residential mix

期刊

URBAN STUDIES
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/00420980231194834

关键词

demographics; diversity/cohesion/segregation; neighbourhood; race/ethnicity; social frontiers; social psychology; theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the impact of neighborhood boundaries on residents and highlights the profound effects that the gradient of these boundaries can have on the psychological well-being and life trajectories of individuals living in these areas. The article presents a theory of the impacts of abrupt community boundaries, also known as social frontiers, on limiting social contact between neighboring communities and exacerbating territorial conflicts. The implications of these findings for empirical research are also discussed.
Until very recently, the question of how residents might be affected by the gradient of neighbourhood boundaries - whether these boundaries are abrupt or gradual - has remained largely absent from mainstream segregation research. Yet, theoretical and empirical findings emerging from recent studies suggest the impacts could be profound and far-reaching. This article seeks to provide a conceptual foundation for understanding such effects. We focus on the concept of 'social frontiers': spatial discontinuities in the geography of residential mix which occur when community boundaries are abrupt. Drawing on insights from cognate disciplines, we develop a theory of social frontier impacts that articulates their potential importance in limiting and shaping contact between neighbouring communities, exacerbating territorial conflict and ultimately affecting the psychological wellbeing and life course outcomes of those living at the frontier. We present our thesis as a series of propositions and corollaries, and reflect on the implications for empirical research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据