4.6 Article

Urban public health emergencies and the COVID-19 pandemic. Part 2: Infrastructures, urban governance and civil society

期刊

URBAN STUDIES
卷 60, 期 9, 页码 1535-1547

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/00420980231170741

关键词

civil society; COVID-19; infrastructure; pandemic; urban governance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

COVID-19 has brought sudden and dramatic impacts on the organization and governance of urban life, leading to fundamentally new understandings of urban public health. We emphasize the association between pandemics and minority and vulnerable groups, both in the past and present. We document the emergence of participatory, community-led responses to the pandemic and the promise of more inclusive urban policies characterized by self-organization. We argue for public health policies to be mindful of local contingencies and strive for healthier cities for all, rather than solely protecting the health of the wealthy few.
COVID-19 had sudden and dramatic impacts on the organisation and governance of urban life. In Part 2 of this Special Issue on public health emergencies we question the extent to which the pandemic ushered in fundamentally new understandings of urban public health, noting that ideas of urban pathology and the relation of dirt, disease and danger in cities, have long informed practices of planning. Emphasising important continuities in the way pandemics are associated with minoritised and vulnerable groups, past and present, we note that public health initiatives can often exacerbate existing health divides, and actually deepen health crises. Against this, we document the emergence of participatory, community-led responses to the pandemic that offered the promise of more inclusive urban policy, often characterised by self-organisation. While we argue that any public health policy needs to be mindful of local contingencies, the promise of inclusive policies is that they will lead to healthier cities for all, not simply protect the health of the wealthy few.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据