Governing capabilities, not places - how to understand social sustainability implementation in urban development

Social sustainability's implementation in urban development is a complex endeavour that demands alternative forms of governance. This article draws on the capabilities approach as an evaluative framework to better understand this implementation process. Through an in-depth case comparison of two Dutch urban development projects, the study analyses how collaborative governance situations (i.e. actors, activities and phases) relate to the expansions of resident capabilities in the urban areas. The findings present three principles for a 'capability-centred governance' of social sustainability in urban development: (1) integrate human logic into urban governance situations (2) balance strong goal commitment with experimentalist approaches and (3) institutionalise social sustainability implementation. The article concludes that social sustainability's implementation requires a conceptualisation in which improvements in people's lives are not seen as the self-evident consequences of a set of place-based policy interventions, but instead as a guiding principle that should continuously be reflected upon and learned from during the different phases of urban development processes.

Automated summary

The implementation of social sustainability in urban development requires alternative forms of governance. This article uses the capabilities approach to analyze how collaborative governance situations relate to the expansions of resident capabilities in Dutch urban development projects. The findings suggest three principles for a capability-centered governance: integrating human logic into urban governance, balancing commitment with experimentalist approaches, and institutionalizing social sustainability implementation.