4.5 Article

Attribute attention and option attention in risky choice

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Psychology

Structural Parameter Interdependencies in Computational Models of Cognition

Antonia Krefeld-Schwalb et al.

Summary: Computational modeling of cognition allows measurement of latent psychological variables through adjustable model parameters, but estimation and interpretation of the parameters may be impaired if there are strong intercorrelations within the model. Strong parameter interdependencies are especially likely in models that combine a subjective value function with a probabilistic choice rule.

PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW (2022)

Article Psychology

Nonlinear Probability Weighting Can Reflect Attentional Biases in Sequential Sampling

Veronika Zilker et al.

Summary: The study explores the connection between nonlinear probability weighting and attentional biases in decision making, using a combination of the Attentional Drift Diffusion Model (aDDM) and Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT). Findings from simulated choice processes and data analysis reveal potential distortions in probability weighting and the relationship between response times and attentional biases. These results advance the integration of two prominent computational frameworks in decision making.

PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW (2022)

Article Psychology, Experimental

A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Visual Attention on Choice

Roopali Bhatnagar et al.

Summary: This study meta-analyzes previous research on the effect of attention manipulation on choices and reveals that manipulating total exposure time has the strongest influence on choices, followed by controlling the location of the last fixation. Manipulating the location of the first fixation does not have a significant effect on choices.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2022)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Toward an attentional turn in research on risky choice

Veronika Zilker et al.

Summary: The dominant approach to studying decision making under risk has been to use psychoeconomic functions, which overlooks the cognitive mechanisms underlying risky choice. Recent research suggests that deviations from normative prescriptions may result from imbalances in attention allocation, promising to overcome the challenges of the traditional approach.

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2022)

Article Psychology, Applied

A multiattribute attentional drift diffusion model

Geoffrey Fisher

Summary: This paper proposes a model that describes how fluctuations in attention to choice set features impacts decision-making. Two laboratory studies found that only 80% of an unattended attribute's value and 60% of an unattended option's value were integrated in the evidence accumulation process. Additionally, attentional bias identified here causally affects decisions and has implications for understanding multiattribute choice.

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES (2021)

Article Management

Intertemporal Choices Are Causally Influenced by Fluctuations in Visual Attention

Geoffrey Fisher

Summary: Intertemporal discount rates vary widely due to differences in visual attention allocation during decision-making. Experimental findings suggest that variations in attention allocation can explain differences in discounting across individuals and influence decision making and purchasing behavior.

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

How top-down and bottom-up attention modulate risky choice

Yonatan Vanunu et al.

Summary: The study shows that initial attention in risky choice is driven by perceptual properties of the stimulus, while subsequent choices are more influenced by goal-driven factors. Options with the highest values and largest font sizes have the greatest impact on choice, while distractors may attract attention but do not affect actual decision-making.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2021)

Article Psychology

The Visual Environment and Attention in Decision Making

Jacob L. Orquin et al.

Summary: Visual factors, such as central positioning of information, larger surface size, decreased set size of competing elements, and increased visual salience, play a significant role in determining attention compared to cognitive factors like preference, task instructions, and ultimately chosen options. Understanding real-world decision making requires an integration of both visual and cognitive factors in future theories of attention and decision making.

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN (2021)

Article Psychology, Biological

Value-based attention but not divisive normalization influences decisions with multiple alternatives

Sebastian Gluth et al.

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2020)

Article Psychology, Experimental

Age Differences in Risk Attitude Are Shaped by Option Complexity

Veronika Zilker et al.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2020)

Article Psychology, Experimental

The case of muddled units in temporal discounting

Benjamin T. Vincent et al.

COGNITION (2020)

Article Statistics & Probability

R-squared for Bayesian Regression Models

Andrew Gelman et al.

AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)

Article Economics

Eye-tracking and economic theories of choice under risk

Glenn W. Harrison et al.

JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMIC SCIENCE ASSOCIATION-JESA (2019)

Review Psychology

A Meta-Analytic Review of Two Modes of Learning and the Description-Experience Gap

Dirk U. Wulff et al.

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN (2018)

Article Agricultural Economics & Policy

Visual Biases in Decision Making

Jacob L. Orquin et al.

APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY (2018)

Article Psychology, Mathematical

On the importance of avoiding shortcuts in applying cognitive models to hierarchical data

Udo Boehm et al.

BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2018)

Article Psychology, Experimental

Prospect Theory Reflects Selective Allocation of Attention

Thorsten Pachur et al.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2018)

Article Psychology, Experimental

Attention and Choice Across Domains

Stephanie M. Smith et al.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2018)

Article Psychology, Experimental

An attentional drift diffusion model over binary-attribute choice

Geoffrey Fisher

COGNITION (2017)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Who Dares, Who Errs? Disentangling Cognitive and Motivational Roots of Age Differences in Decisions Under Risk

Thorsten Pachur et al.

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2017)

Article Psychology

How the twain can meet: Prospect theory and models of heuristics in risky choice

Thorsten Pachur et al.

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (2017)

Article Psychology, Applied

Eye Movements in Risky Choice

Neil Stewart et al.

JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING (2016)

Review Psychology, Mathematical

Using Bayesian hierarchical parameter estimation to assess the generalizability of cognitive models of choice

Benjamin Scheibehenne et al.

PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2015)

Review Psychology, Mathematical

Sequential sampling and paradoxes of risky choice

Sudeep Bhatia

PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2014)

Article Business, Finance

Discriminating among probability weighting functions using adaptive design optimization

Daniel R. Cavagnaro et al.

JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY (2013)

Article Psychology, Experimental

How choice ecology influences search in decisions from experience

Tomas Lejarraga et al.

COGNITION (2012)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

The dynamics of decision making in risky choice: an eye-tracking analysis

Susann Fiedler et al.

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2012)

Article Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications

Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation for cumulative prospect theory

Hakan Nilsson et al.

JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY (2011)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions

Ian Krajbich et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2011)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Hierarchical Diffusion Models for Two-Choice Response Times

Joachim Vandekerckhove et al.

PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2011)

Article Neurosciences

Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice

Ian Krajbich et al.

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE (2010)

Review Psychology

Mindful judgment and Decision Making

Elke U. Weber et al.

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY (2009)

Article Psychology, Experimental

GAZE SHIFTS DO NOT AFFECT PREFERENCE JUDGMENTS OF GRAPHIC PATTERNS

Hiroshi Nittono et al.

PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS (2009)

Review Psychology

New paradoxes of risky decision making

Michael H. Birnbaum

PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW (2008)

Review Psychology, Mathematical

An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection

JN Rouder et al.

PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2005)

Article Neurosciences

Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference

S Shimojo et al.

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE (2003)

Article Statistics & Probability

Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit

DJ Spiegelhalter et al.

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY (2002)