4.7 Article

Seat belt usage in buses-An observation study of usage and travellers' perspectives

期刊

ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION
卷 190, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107138

关键词

Safety; Seat belt; Public transport; Bus; Misuse; Un-buckle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to evaluate and understand the usage of seat belts in buses. Through observation, focus group discussions, and a web survey, it was found that seat belt usage can be improved, especially in regional and commercial bus traffic. The study also identified reasons for non-usage, such as discomfort and concerns about getting stuck. Recommendations were provided to increase seat belt usage.
This study aims to evaluate seat belt usage in buses and to understand travellers' incentives of seat belt usage. Methods used are observational studies (10 cities, with 328 bus observations), focus group discussion (7 groups with a total of 32 participants) and a web survey (n = 1737 respondents). The results show that the seat belt use among bus passengers can be improved especially in regional and commercial bus traffic. It is more common to buckle up on long trips than on short trips. However, even though observations show high usage during long trips, travellers report that they remove the seat belt after a while if they want to sleep or for comfort reasons. For the bus drivers it is not possible to control passengers' usage. Dirty seat belts and technical malfunction might deter some passengers from using them and therefore systematic cleaning and control of seats and belts are recommended. On short trips one reason for not using the belt is related to worries about getting stuck and not being ready to get off in time. In general, it is most important to increase the usage on high-speed roads (>60 km/ h), in lower speed it might be more important to provide a seat for each passenger. Based on the results a list of recommendations is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据