4.7 Article

Consumption and production of cleaner energy by prosumers

期刊

ENERGY ECONOMICS
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106760

关键词

Photovoltaics; Net metering; Energy demand; Rebound effect; Solar policy; Energy transition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As investments in small-scale energy generating systems, such as residential rooftop photovoltaics (PV), increase, the impact on energy consumption decisions, like purchasing green electricity, is still unclear. Two utility-maximization models are presented to explore this relationship. The results show that the size of the PV system is positively correlated with total energy consumption but has a very weak impact on green electricity purchases. Optimal system size increases with electricity prices. These findings have important implications for decarbonization goals through energy transition.
As investments in small-scale energy generating systems, such as residential rooftop photovoltaics (PV), increase it is not clear how electricity generated from these systems affects energy consumption decisions such as the purchase of green electricity offered by electric utilities. We present two utility-maximization models to determine energy consumption and production decisions and conduct simulations to test the strength of relationships. The first model maximizes a prosumer's utility function where the size of PV is exogenous. The second model presents a prosumer that makes decisions in two stages - utility maximization to determine energy consumption and net revenue maximization to determine size of the generation system. Results from the exogenous model suggest that while there is a positive correlation between PV system size and total energy consumption, the impact on green electricity purchases (non-negative) is very weak. When the prosumer optimally chooses her system size, the optimal size increases with electricity prices. These results have implications for achieving decarbonization goals through an energy transition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据