期刊
RESEARCH POLICY
卷 52, 期 7, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2023.104817
关键词
SINTA platform; Research assessment; Research evaluation; Ranking database; Low -middle income countries; Higher education; World class university
类别
The article suggests that ranking researchers on a platform can improve productivity, but it overlooks the possibility of previous resource allocation not being inefficient. The proposed solution shifts resources towards measurable metrics without understanding its long-term effects. Thus, considering potential trade-offs and the future benefits is important.
The Fry et al. article suggests that productivity can be improved by ranking researchers on a platform, but this assumption overlooks the possibility that previous resource allocation may not have been inefficient. The pro-posed solution simply shifts resources towards measurable metrics, such as SINTA, without a clear understanding of its long-term effects. Therefore, it is important to consider potential trade-offs and be mindful of whether such policies are beneficial in the future.The authors suggest that Fry et al. should broaden their sources and engage with stakeholders to gain a nuanced understanding of the local context and challenges confronting researchers in Indonesia. They also emphasize the importance of prioritizing research integrity over traditional metrics and rankings, aligning research funding allocation with national development priorities, and considering potential trade-offs when implementing policies such as the SINTA platform. This is the true cost of implementing rank-based and ingratiation-driven research curation system.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据