4.7 Article

Exploring the nonlinear influence of nonverbal dominance in marketing communicators: Instrumental outcomes, social outcomes, and persuasion

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114201

关键词

Dominance; Nonverbal communication; Competence; Warmth; Persuasion

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Expressions of dominance can be powerful in interpersonal marketing communications, but research on its persuasiveness has produced contradictory results. In order to establish a meaningful link between nonverbal dominance and persuasive outcomes, this study integrates nonverbal communication research with the warmth-competence model of social cognition. The findings suggest that communicators with intermediate levels of nonverbal dominance are generally more persuasive than those perceived as low or high in dominance.
Expressions of dominance present potentially powerful nonverbal means for interpersonal marketing communications. Yet, research on the persuasiveness of nonverbal dominance has generated seemingly contradictory results. To reconcile these and establish whether there is a meaningful link between nonverbal dominance and persuasive outcomes, our study integrates nonverbal communication research with the warmth-competence model of social cognition. A field study and five experiments demonstrate that communicators perceived as either low or high in nonverbal dominance will generally be less persuasive than communicators exuding intermediate levels. Underlying this overall bell-shaped influence of dominance on persuasion are two independent pathways: one channeling the effect through instrumental outcomes (competence) and the other through social outcomes (warmth). Consumer focus on instrumental over social outcomes and consumer-communicator homophily represent boundary conditions. These findings suggest that nonlinear relationships may have been overlooked in past research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据