4.7 Article

The making of marketing decisions in modern marketing environments

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113872

关键词

Decision-making; Managerial; Modern marketing environments; Situated cognition; Naturalistic decision-making

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, marketing is experiencing a significant transformation due to environmental disruptions and advances in marketing technologies. This study addresses the limited research on how marketing managers navigate the complex, volatile, and data-intensive nature of modern marketing environments. By qualitatively analyzing decision-making processes in 15 companies, the study identifies three key characteristics, namely agility, inventiveness, and reflexiveness. The findings provide insights into the cognitive and behavioral processes involved in marketing decision-making and contribute to understanding how managers respond to challenges in modern marketing environments.
Currently, marketing is undergoing a major shift driven by environmental disruptions and advances in marketing technologies. This shift has implications for marketing decision-making. However, research on how marketing managers navigate modern marketing environments' complex, volatile, and data-intensive nature is limited. This study addresses this gap by qualitatively analyzing marketing managers' decision-making processes in 15 companies. Using the naturalistic decision-making approach and the situative perspective on cognition and action as theoretical lenses, we identify three key characteristics of decision-making in modern marketing environments-namely, agility, inventiveness, and reflexiveness. Our findings provide empirically grounded insights into the cognitive and behavioral processes involved in marketing decision-making and contribute to a deeper understanding of how managers navigate-and respond to-modern marketing environments' challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据