The causal impact of local weather anomalies on beliefs about the occurrence of climate change

Research has demonstrated that members of the public recognize anomalous weather patterns, and that subjective perceptions of the weather are related to beliefs about the occurrence of climate change. Yet despite two decades of scholarship and dozens of studies, inconsistent and insufficient data have made it difficult to credibly identify the causal impact of objective experiences on perceptions, and the impact of perceptions on beliefs regarding climate change occurrence. Here, we overcome these limitations by collecting and analyzing data from a 5-y panel survey of 2,500 individuals in Oklahoma, a US state that is highly divided on questions about climate change. Our findings indicate that the relationship between local weather anomalies and climate change beliefs is heavily dependent on baseline beliefs about whether climate change was occurring. For people who did not believe in climate change in the initial survey in our series, perceptions of anomalously hot and dry seasons shifted their beliefs towards the occurrence of anthropogenic climate change, whereas their perceptions of anomalously cool and wet seasons shifted their beliefs away from anthropogenic climate change. This relationship was not present among people who believed that climate change was occurring at the beginning of the study; their perceptions of seasonal temperature and precipitation anomalies had no effect on their beliefs about climate change. These patterns have substantial implications for the evolution of public beliefs about climate change.

Automated summary

Research has shown that people's subjective perceptions of weather are related to their beliefs about climate change. However, inconsistent and insufficient data have made it difficult to identify the causal impact of objective experiences on perceptions and beliefs about climate change. This study collected and analyzed data from a 5-year panel survey of 2,500 individuals in Oklahoma, a state with high divisions on climate change issues. The findings suggest that the relationship between local weather anomalies and climate change beliefs depends on baseline beliefs about climate change.