4.7 Article

Comparative Analysis Revealed Intrageneric and Intraspecific Genomic Variation in Chloroplast Genomes of Actinidia spp. (Actinidiaceae, Viridiplantae)

期刊

HORTICULTURAE
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae9111175

关键词

cpDNA variations in plants; plastid genomes; kiwifruits; phylogenetics of Ericales; DNA barcoding in plants; ycf2 gene selection process

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to investigate the plastid genomes of Actinidia species and found that the gene composition and sequences are conserved. However, some species showed significant structural rearrangements in their chloroplast chromosomes, resulting in the presence of two main forms.
About ten species of the genus Actinidia Lindl. are known as cultivated plants-alongside the most known A. chinensis var. deliciosa, there are many others, including Far-Eastern cold-hardy kiwifruits such as A. arguta, A. kolomikta, and A. polygama. Unlike most plant species, in which the chloroplast genome is maternally inherited, the family Actinidiaceae possesses a complex system of plastid inheritance with possible transmission through both maternal and paternal lines. The main aim of this work was the assembly of the plastid genomes of three species of Actinidia, their comparison with already-available sequences from databases, and evolutionary analyses. We discovered that the gene composition and gene sequences are conserved; the studied species are either subject to purifying selection or not subject to selection at all (with some exceptions, such as the ycf2 gene). However, the chloroplast chromosomes of some Actinidia species have undergone significant structural rearrangements, leading to the persistence of two main forms, both on an intrageneric and intraspecific level. These results expand our understanding of plastid genomics and genetic diversity within the genus Actinidia, providing a basis for future research in molecular marker development, phylogenetic analysis, and population studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据