4.7 Article

Disruptive Technologies Certification Standard Approach

期刊

AEROSPACE
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/aerospace10070637

关键词

disruptive technologies; certification approach; gap analysis; hybrid-electric propulsion systems; safety assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid technological change has heavily impacted transportation, with hybrid-electric propulsion emerging as a viable alternative for ground, marine, and aviation industries due to its advantages in fuel savings, reduced pollution, and lower noise emissions. This disruptive technology requires an evolution in the certification approach, which should be based on a safety assessment integrated into the system's development. The Certification Approach for Disruptive Technologies adopts a top-down process to identify and propose solutions for certification gaps.
The current rapid technological change identifies the evolution of people's transportation as one of the primary effects. Hybrid-electric propulsion reveals potential advantages, including fuel savings, lower pollution, and reduced noise emissions. It is becoming a viable alternative propulsion technology for ground and marine applications and the aviation sector. Hybrid-electric propulsion systems can meet the high demands of next-generation aircraft in terms of lower operating costs, economy, and fuel efficiency while maintaining high flight performance. Introducing similar disruptive technologies requires an evolution of the traditional certification approach and associated means of compliance. Even if it starts with evaluating a hybrid propulsion system, the proposed process can also be adopted in other areas where disruptive technologies need to be adopted, such as H2 fuel systems and active wings, to summarize some potential applications. The Certification Approach for Disruptive Technologies adopts a top-down process, reversing and mixing the usual certification approach currently used for aircraft. It is based on a safety assessment fully integrated into the system's development. The result of this process will consist of a list of gaps in certification requirements, their classification based on gap solution impact, and proposals to close those gaps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据