4.3 Article

Monitoring censored lifetime data with a weighted-likelihood scheme

期刊

NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS
卷 63, 期 8, 页码 631-646

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nav.21724

关键词

CUSUM chart; data censoring; EWMA chart; run length distribution; statistical process control; Weibull distribution; weighted likelihood

资金

  1. National Science Fund of China [11501209, 11271135, 11571113, 71402133, 71602155]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2015M570348]
  3. Shanghai Rising Star Program [16QA1401700]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. 111 Project [B14019]
  6. International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program [20160089]
  7. RGC General Research Fund [619913]
  8. Project of Shanghai Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lifetime experiments are common in many research areas and industrial applications. Recently, process monitoring for lifetime observations has received increasing attention. However, some existing methods are inadequate as neither their in control (IC) nor out of control (OC) performance is satisfactory. In addition, the challenges associated with designing robust and flexible control schemes have yet to be fully addressed. To overcome these limitations, this article utilizes a newly developed weighted likelihood ratio test, and proposes a novel monitoring strategy that automatically combines the likelihood of past samples with the exponential weighted sum average scheme. The proposed Censored Observation-based Weighted-Likelihood (COWL) control chart gives desirable IC and OC performances and is robust under various scenarios. In addition, a self-starting control chart is introduced to cope with the problem of insufficient reference samples. Our simulation shows a stronger power in detecting changes in the censored lifetime data using our scheme than using other alternatives. A real industrial example based on the breaking strength of carbon fiber also demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据