4.5 Review

Organosolv pretreatment: an in-depth purview of mechanics of the system

期刊

BIORESOURCES AND BIOPROCESSING
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1186/s40643-023-00673-0

关键词

Lignocellulose biomass; Organic solvent; Pretreatment; Lignin; Cellulose

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The concept of biorefinery has been advanced globally, with organosolv pretreatment strategy receiving increasing research attention due to its efficiency in removing recalcitrant lignin and dissolving cellulose. The high-performance organosolv system uses green solvents and can be reused, contributing to the biorefinery sector and sustainability. The system's major advantage lies in its continuous removal of lignin to improve cellulose accessibility, thus facilitating subsequent biorefinery steps.
The concept of biorefinery has been advancing globally and organosolv pretreatment strategy has seen an upsurge in research due to its efficiency in removing the recalcitrant lignin and dissolution of cellulose. The high-performance organosolv system uses green solvents and its reusability contributes concurrently to the biorefinery sector and sustainability. The major advantage of the current system involves the continuous removal of lignin to enhance cellulose accessibility, thereby easing the later biorefinery steps, which were immensely restricted due to the recalcitrant lignin. The current system process can be further explored and enhanced via the amalgamation of new technologies, which is still a work in progress. Thus, the current review summarizes organosolv pretreatment and the range of solvents used, along with a detailed mechanistic approach that results in efficient pretreatment of LCB. The latest developments for designing high-performance pretreatment systems, their pitfalls, and advanced assessments such as Life Cycle Assessment along with Techno-Economic Assessment have also been deliberated to allow an insight into its diverse potential applicability towards a sustainable future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据