4.8 Article

The rs1421085 variant within FTO promotes brown fat thermogenesis

期刊

NATURE METABOLISM
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42255-023-00847-2

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rs1421085 T>C variant within the FTO gene, which is a genetic risk signal for obesity, is found to be functional in vitro but lacks evidence at the organism level. In this study, researchers recapitulate the homologous human variant in mice and discover that mice carrying the C-allele exhibit increased brown fat thermogenic capacity and resistance to high-fat diet-induced adiposity. Both in vivo and in vitro data suggest that the C-allele enhances the transcription of the Fto gene in brown adipocytes, leading to stronger chromatin looping between the enhancer region and Fto promoter. Furthermore, FTO knockdown or inhibition eliminates the increased thermogenic ability of brown adipocytes carrying the C-allele. These findings establish rs1421085 T>C as a functional variant promoting brown fat thermogenesis.
One lead genetic risk signal of obesity-the rs1421085 T>C variant within the FTO gene-is reported to be functional in vitro but lacks evidence at an organism level. H er e we recapitulate the homologous human variant in m i c e w i t h global and brown adipocyte-specific variant knock-in and reveal that mice carrying the C-allele show increased brown fat thermogenic capacity and resistance to high-fat diet-induced adiposity, whereas the obesity-related phenotypic changes are blunted at thermoneutrality. Both in vivo and in vitro data reveal that the C-allele in brown adipocytes enhances the transcription of the Fto gene, which is associated with stronger chromatin looping linking the enhancer region and Fto promoter. Moreover, FTO knockdown or inhibition effectively eliminates the increased thermogenic ability of brown adipocytes carrying the C-allele. Taken together, these findings identify rs1421085 T>C as a functional variant promoting brown fat thermogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据