4.8 Article

Synergistic effect of heterointerface engineering and oxygen vacancy in CoFe-layered double hydroxide/Co3O4 composite for boosting alkaline water oxidation

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY CHEMISTRY
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2023.101716

关键词

Electrocatalyst; Oxygen evolution reaction; Defect engineering; Interface engineering; Oxygen vacancy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A composite material, CoFe-LDH/Vo-Co3O4@C, has been developed with efficient surface modulation and abundant structural defect sites, which exhibits remarkable activity and long-term stability for the oxygen evolution reaction. The material shows a low overpotential and small Tafel slope, outperforming traditional RuO2 materials. Moreover, it demonstrates excellent electrocatalytic durability for over 100 hours in alkaline solution.
Developing highly active and cost-efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is crucial for practical water electrolysis, which is an ideal technique for obtaining high-purity hydrogen without causing environmental pollution. In this study, we propose a composite material of bimetallic CoFe-layered double hydroxide (LDH) and oxygen vacancy-rich Co3O4 on carbon support (CoFe-LDH/Vo-Co3O4@C), which is synthesized using co-precipitation, thermal treatment, and facile ultrasonic treatment methods. By efficiently modulating surface electronic structure and introducing abundant structural defect sites, the CoFe-LDH/Vo- Co3O4@C exhibits remarkable OER activity and long-term stability. Specifically, the CoFe-LDH/Vo-Co3O4@C has a low overpotential of 296 mV to achieve a current density of 10 mA cm-2, and a very small Tafel slope of 60.2 mV dec- 1, which are much superior values than those of the precious metal-based RuO2 (331 mV and 73.7 mV dec-1). Furthermore, the excellent electrocatalytic durability of the CoFe-LDH/Vo-Co3O4@C for over 100 h in alkaline solution suggests its potential for industrial applications of water electrolysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据