4.5 Article

Glycan shield and epitope masking of a coronavirus spike protein observed by cryo-electron microscopy

期刊

NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 899-905

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3293

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1R01GM120553-01, T32GM008268]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [Rubicon 019.2015.2.310.006]
  3. European Molecular Biology Organisation (EMBO) [ALTF 933-2015]
  4. Institute Pasteur
  5. CNRS
  6. NIH [1S10RR23057, 1S10OD018111]
  7. NSF [DBI-1338135]
  8. CNSI at UCLA
  9. University of Washington's Proteomics Resource [UWPR95794]
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences [1338135] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1338135] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The threat of a major coronavirus pandemic urges the development of strategies to combat these pathogens. Human coronavirus NL63 (HCoV-NL63) is an a-coronavirus that can cause severe lower-respiratory-tract infections requiring hospitalization. We report here the 3.4-A-resolution cryo-EM reconstruction of the HCoV-NL63 coronavirus spike glycoprotein trimer, which mediates entry into host cells and is the main target of neutralizing antibodies during infection. The map resolves the extensive glycan shield obstructing the protein surface and, in combination with mass spectrometry, provides a structural framework to understand the accessibility to antibodies. The structure reveals the complete architecture of the fusion machinery including the triggering loop and the C-terminal domains, which contribute to anchoring the trimer to the viral membrane. Our data further suggest that HCoV-NL63 and other coronaviruses use molecular trickery, based on epitope masking with glycans and activating conformational changes, to evade the immune system of infected hosts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据