4.6 Article

From Geotechnical Data to GeoBIM Models: Testing Strategies for an Ex-Industrial Site in Turin

期刊

BUILDINGS
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings13092343

关键词

BIM; geomodelling; interoperability; visualisation; database; assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) methods has changed workflows and allowed for new ways of working. This paper explores the integration of BIM with geotechnical/geological modelling (GeoBIM) and provides a flexible method for assessing integration strategies. The proposed evaluation framework is universal and adaptable to any new integration approach.
Over the years, the use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) methods has changed the workflows of various actors, providing better integration across different domains and allowing for new ways of working. This paper outlines the interest towards the integration of BIM with geotechnical/geological modelling (GeoBIM), which still represents a major challenge in several respects. The present study aims to provide a flexible method for assessing various integration strategies and to establish a preferred workflow based on the selected requirements and preference parameters. This integration is designed to provide a final federated model that can also be archived in the as-built documentation. Four alternative processes were selected to analyse the specific types of data and transformations required in the process. Each process was applied on a real case study in order to test the developed assessment framework using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Due to technological advances, modelling and integration workflows change rapidly; however, our results show that the proposed evaluation framework is universal and adaptable to any new integration approach. Further research efforts must be undertaken to reduce attribute data losses and enhance the interoperability between systems and professionals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据