4.5 Review

An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 654-662

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.154

关键词

-

资金

  1. VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
  2. National Space Biomedical Research Institute through NASA [NCC 9-58]
  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK043881, DK092197]
  4. University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory
  5. University of Washington Department of Urology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kidney stone imaging is an important diagnostic tool and initial step in deciding which therapeutic options to use for the management of kidney stones. Guidelines provided by the American College of Radiology, American Urological Association, and European Association of Urology differ regarding the optimal initial imaging modality to use to evaluate patients with suspected obstructive nephrolithiasis. Noncontrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis consistently provides the most accurate diagnosis but also exposes patients to ionizing radiation. Traditionally, ultrasonography has a lower sensitivity and specificity than CT, but does not require use of radiation. However, when these imaging modalities were compared in a randomized controlled trial they were found to have equivalent diagnostic accuracy within the emergency department. Both modalities have advantages and disadvantages. Kidney, ureter, bladder (KUB) plain film radiography is most helpful in evaluating for interval stone growth in patients with known stone disease, and is less useful in the setting of acute stones. MRI provides the possibility of 3D imaging without exposure to radiation, but it is costly and currently stones are difficult to visualize. Further developments are expected to enhance each imaging modality for the evaluation and treatment of kidney stones in the near future. A proposed algorithm for imaging patients with acute stones in light of the current guidelines and a randomized controlled trial could aid clinicians.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据