4.7 Article

DNA-Modified Graphene Oxide Supported on a Fire-Resistant Hydroxyapatite Paper for Timely and Reliable Fire Warning

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 6, 期 13, 页码 11612-11621

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.3c01626

关键词

graphene oxide; DNA; hydroxyapatite; flame retardancy; fire warning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports a modified graphene oxide (GO) sensor supported on hydroxyapatite (HA) nanowire paper modified with single-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (ssDNA) which enhances the flame retardancy of GO through its action as a flame retardant and nitrogen doping. This work highlights the importance of biomolecules and inorganic materials in regulating the fire warning performance of GO.
The traditional fire alarm sensors suffer from sluggishfire warnings.Recently, graphene oxide (GO)-based sensors have attracted much attentiondue to their ultrafast fire warning. There are two major challenges:(i) the duration time of fire warning is short due to poor flame retardancyof GO and (ii) the response temperature of the GO sensor is high dueto the abundant oxygen-containing groups. This work reports the single-strandeddeoxyribonucleic acid (ssDNA)-modified GO supported on the hydroxyapatite(HA) nanowire paper. The ssDNA molecules have an action of intumescentflame retardancy, which effectively improves the flame retardancyof GO. Moreover, the thermal degradation of nitrogenous base of ssDNAcauses nitrogen doping in GO. Concomitantly, the thermal reductionof GO is promoted, and some oxidative groups are removed. As a result,the period of fire warning of GO increases up to 180 s, and the responsetemperature decreases to as low as 159 & DEG;C. Besides, the HA paperwith intrinsic fire resistance ensures the structural integrity ofssDNA-DNA in the flame, contributing to the steady workingof the composite paper. This work highlights the critical roles ofbiomolecules and inorganic materials in synergistically regulatingfire warning performance of GO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据