4.5 Article

Efficacy of Sildenafil in Infants with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension

期刊

CHILDREN-BASEL
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/children10081397

关键词

bronchopulmonary dysplasia; BPD; pulmonary hypertension; sildenafil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of sildenafil in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)-associated pulmonary hypertension (PH). The study found that sildenafil treatment led to improvement in PH as evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and infants showed improvement in their respiratory severity score (RSS) and FiO2 after prolonged therapy. However, TTE improvements did not correlate with clinical improvements.
Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common comorbidity in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Sildenafil is a widely recognized therapy for PH, but its efficacy in infants with BPD is questionable. We propose to assess the efficacy of sildenafil in BPD-associated PH as evaluated based on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) changes and clinical measures. Methods: Data were retrospectively and prospectively collected. Inclusion criteria were gestational age (GA) < 32 weeks, birth weight (BW) < 1500 g with severe BPD, diagnosis of PH via TTE on sildenafil treatment. PH was evaluated via TTE, which was performed monthly after 36 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) as a standard of care, and re-reviewed by a single pediatric cardiologist, who was blind to the initial reading. Results: In total, 19 patients were enrolled in the study, having a median GA of 24 3/7 weeks (IQR 23 5/7-25 5/7) and a median BW of 598 g (IQR 572-735). Sildenafil treatment was started at a median PMA of 40.4 weeks. The median respiratory severity score (RSS) at 28 d was 6.5, RSS and FiO2 showed improvement about 12 weeks after starting sildenafil treatment. Conclusions: Improvement in PH was noted via TTE, and patients had improvement in their RSS and FiO2 after prolonged therapy. However, TTE improvements did not correlate with clinical improvements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据