4.5 Review

Pediatric Palliative Care: Insights into Assessment Tools and Review Instruments

期刊

CHILDREN-BASEL
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/children10081406

关键词

pediatric palliative care; assessment tools; quality of life; pain; symptoms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The assessment of needs and outcomes in pediatric palliative care (PPC) is challenging due to its multidimensional nature, low patient population, heterogeneity of diseases, cognitive impairment in patients, and physiological development of children. Standardized and validated tools are needed to assess needs, symptom severity, and PPC service quality. This review discusses current tools used in PPC and proposes a classification into eligibility tools, patient and family needs assessment tools, and care assessment tools.
The proper assessment of needs and outcomes in pediatric palliative care (PPC) is imperative to ensure the best possible service to patients and families. However, given the multidimensional nature of PPC, the low number of patients in this setting, the heterogeneity of diseases, the presence of cognitive impairment in many patients, and the physiological development of children, outcomes can be complex and difficult to measure. Consequently, in this context, the use of standardized and validated tools to assess the needs of children and families, to assess symptom severity, and to estimate the quality of PPC service represent a current need. Even if efforts have been made to standardize approaches and tools for palliative care in adults, to our knowledge, a similar comprehensive assessment of PPC has not yet been conducted to date. This narrative review provides an overview and discusses the evaluation of tools currently applied in PPC, with an educational intent for healthcare providers. We found that several instruments are available to assess different dimensions of PPC. We proposed a classification into eligibility tools, patient and family needs assessment tools, and care assessment tools. At present, two main eligibility tools exist, the PaPaS Scale and the ACCAPED Scale questionnaire. Most of the tools for patient and family needs assessment have not been specifically validated in the PPC setting, and many may be more readily applied in research settings rather than in daily practice. Similar considerations can be made for tools assessing QoL, while tools assessing PPC service quality seem to be easily applied. Efforts to develop new specific tools and validate existing ones are undoubtedly advocated. However, in the patient's best interest, PPC healthcare providers should start using available tools, regardless of their validation status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据