4.5 Article

High-Power Acoustic-Optical Q-Switched 1.83 mu m Tm-Doped Bulk Laser

期刊

PHOTONICS
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/photonics10080876

关键词

1.83 mu m; actively Q-switched; Tm:YLF crystal

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports a high-power acoustic-optical (AO) Q-switched Tm:YLF laser operating at around 1.83 μm by controlling the transmittance of the output coupler. The maximum output power under continuous-wave (CW) operation is 13 W with a slope efficiency of 32.7%. By inserting a YAG etalon into the cavity, the linewidth is compressed below 0.5 nm with a maximum output power of 12.2 W. In the Q-switched state, a maximum pulsed output power of 10.32 W with a pulse duration of 150 ns is achieved at a repetition rate of 15 kHz, and a maximum pulsed energy of 1.13 mJ with a duration of 131 ns is generated at 5 kHz. The relationship between the output wavelength and crystal length is theoretically analyzed, indicating that increasing the loss at 1880 nm is the key to achieving high-power output at 1.83 μm.
We report on a high-power acoustic-optical (AO) Q-switched Tm:YLF laser operating at similar to 1.83 mu m by controlling the transmittance of the output coupler. Under the continuous-wave (CW) operation, the maximum output power of 13 W is achieved, and the slope efficiency is up to 32.7%. With a YAG etalon inserted into the cavity, the linewidth is compressed below 0.5 nm with a maximum output power of 12.2 W. In the Q-switched state, the maximum pulsed output power of 10.32 W is achieved with a pulse duration of 150 ns when the repetition rate is 15 kHz. And the maximum pulsed energy of 1.13 mJ is generated with a duration of 131 ns at 5 kHz. As far as we know, this is the highest output power reported for the CW and pulsed 1.83 mu m laser. In addition, the relationship between the output wavelength and crystal length is theoretically analyzed, which shows that increasing the loss of 1880 nm is the key to high-power 1.83 mu m laser output.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据