4.6 Article

mRNA Abundance of Neurogenic Factors Correlates with Hearing Capacity in Auditory Brainstem Nuclei of the Rat

期刊

LIFE-BASEL
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life13091858

关键词

real-time PCR; auditory pathway; neurogenesis; cochlear nucleus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the changes in mRNA abundance of genes influencing neural stem cell development and neurogenesis in the rat cochlear nucleus over time. Age- and hearing-specific patterns of changes in mRNA abundance of neurogenically relevant genes were detected. Crucial neurogenic factors with significant and relevant influence on neurogenesis were identified. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the neurogenesis of the auditory pathway.
Neural stem cells (NSCs) have previously been described up to the adult stage in the rat cochlear nucleus (CN). A decreasing neurogenic potential was observed with critical changes around hearing onset. A better understanding of molecular factors affecting NSCs and neurogenesis is of interest as they represent potential targets to treat the cause of neurologically based hearing disorders. The role of genes affecting NSC development and neurogenesis in CN over time on hearing capacity has remained unclear. This study investigated the mRNA abundance of genes influencing NSCs and neurogenesis in rats' CN over time. The CN of rats on postnatal days 6, 12, and 24 were examined. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction arrays were used to compare mRNA levels of 84 genes relevant to NSCs and neurogenesis. Age- and hearing-specific patterns of changes in mRNA abundance of neurogenically relevant genes were detected in the rat CN. Additionally, crucial neurogenic factors with significant and relevant influence on neurogenesis were identified. The results of this work should contribute to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the neurogenesis of the auditory pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据