4.6 Article

Safety Barrier Certificates for Path Integral Control: Safety-Critical Control of Quadrotors

期刊

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 6006-6012

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2023.3301297

关键词

Robot safety; aerial systems; mechanics and control; model predictive path integral control; control barrier function; collision avoidance

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This letter presents a novel predictive control algorithm that combines control barrier function (CBF) technique with path integral control to develop a safety-critical controller for quadrotors. An efficient sequential projection algorithm is adopted to steer unsafe sampled inputs to a feasible region limited by safety barrier certificates. Comparisons with existing methods show that the proposed controller, which provides collective thrusts and body rates (CTBR) control policies, is able to deliver more robust maneuvers in obstacle avoidance.
The safety issue arises as one of the most important requirements for autonomous quadrotor flight. Recently, control barrier function (CBF) technique has been developed to provide necessary and sufficient conditions on safety for robot systems. Previous works unified CBF with control techniques in an optimization fashion. However, these methods could not provide consistent performance, especially in clutter environments. In this letter, we present a novel predictive control algorithm that combines CBF and path integral control to develop a safety-critical controller for quadrotors. An efficient sequential projection algorithm is adopted to steer unsafe sampled inputs to a feasible region limited by safety barrier certificates. Comparing to existing methods, one distinguishing feature of our proposed method is that we provide collective thrusts and body rates (CTBR) control policies. Simulations and experiments demonstrate that our controller can deliver more robust maneuvers in the course of obstacle avoidance than state-of-the-art safe controllers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据