4.6 Article

eDNA Metabarcoding- and Microscopic Analysis for Diet Determination in Waterfowl, a Comparative Study in Vejlerne, Denmark

期刊

BIOLOGY-BASEL
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biology12091272

关键词

eDNA metabarcoding; microscopy; waterfowl; diet determination; conservation biology; frequency of occurrence; cumulative curves; taxonomic resolution

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

eDNA metabarcoding is a new method for studying the diet of wild animals. This study compared eDNA metabarcoding with microscopy to determine the diet of four species of waterfowl. It was found that combining morphological analysis and DNA metabarcoding can provide sufficient information for ecological inquiries.
Simple Summary eDNA metabarcoding is a relatively novel method for studying the diet of wild animals. This study compares eDNA metabarcoding with microscopy, in order to determine the diet of four species of waterfowl. In total, 56 plants were identified at the species level. The study concluded that the combination of morphological analysis and DNA metabarcoding can yield adequate information to address pertinent ecological inquiries.Abstract Understanding diets and structural food webs are keys to the apprehension of ecological communities, upon which conservation and management biology are based. The understanding of grazing and habitat choice for waterfowl is one of the most important topics for avian ecologists today and can, to some degree, be answered by dietary analysis. Droppings collected from four waterfowl, the Eurasian wigeon (Anas penelope), Greylag goose (Anser anser), pink-footed goose (Anser brachyrhynchus) and Barnacle goose (Branta leucopsis) in Vejlerne (Denmark), were analysed microscopically and through eDNA metabarcoding with the use of next generation sequencing (NGS) to accumulate knowledge about the diet of these waterfowl. In total, 120 dropping samples were microscopically analysed, of which the eDNA metabarcoding analysis was done on 79 samples. The prey items were identified according to the taxonomic level of species, and a qualitative method, frequency of occurrence (FO) and FO calculated as a percentage, was used in order to compare the results from the two methods. As neither of the methods was able to encompass all species discovered when combining the two methods, it was concluded in this study that the two methods can support each other in a dietary analysis of waterfowl, but not replace one another.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据